How to access differentiated API particle populations through continuous technologies
Background
For the synthesis and crystallization of APIs the application of multistage Mixed Suspension Mixed Product Removal Crystallizers (MSMPRCs) can be beneficial in addressing common problems encountered in batch production. The work conducted here focuses on two case studies concerning the combination of wet milling with multistage (MSMPRCs) to improve the physical properties of the respective APIs.
1st Case Study: Standard Batch Process
Limitations of batch
Particles exhibit thin needle morphology
Changing various operating conditions yielded no significant results and so continuous crystallization was employed to try to improve particle aspect ratio
Continuous Crystallization Setup
Various challenges were met when performing the cooling crystallization in the multistage MSMPRC such as crystallization in the feed lines due to temperature drops between feed tanks and crystallizers. This was circumvented by employing heat exchangers on the feed lines.
Kinetic limitations
Issues encountered
Steady state was not reached after days of operation as the system does not retain consistent particle population
Level of nucleation not sufficient to maintain a set population of particles in the crystallizer
Effect of wet milling
Benefits of in-situ wet milling:
Accelerates the nucleation rate due to increased turbulence within the crystallizer
Enables particle attrition which helps to improve the particle aspect ratio
Improvement in final product
Improvement in final product assessed through examination of the aspect ratio of the particles via microscope.
2nd Case Study: Standard Batch Process
Issues with standard batch process
Accessible particle size well in excess of formulation specification of50 < D50 [um] < 100
Forecast for API demand exceeded free batch plant capacity for manufacture
Continuous Crystallization Setup
Continuous cooling crystallization performed in cascaded MSMPRCs. In the absence of wet milling, the crystallization ran smoothly and steady-state was attained readily.
Kinetic Limitations
Minimum particle size achievable based on the kinetics of the system
Particle size could only be reduced to a D50 of 290µm
In-situ wet milling required to deliver desired D50 size specification of 50-100µm
Optimized Process and Final Product
Operating the two-stage MSMPRC with a first stage temperature of 18°C and a second stage temperature of 15°C with 5 minute residence times in each stage and a mill speed 16000rpm enabled sustained operation
Milling in stage 2 circumvented fouling issues and a product with a D50 of approximately 75µm was isolated
Conclusions
Robust platforms combining cascaded MSMPRCs and wet milling were developed for the production of two APIs
The particle aspect ratio was improved significantly in Case Study 1 through use of the developed platform
The particle size of the product in Case Study 2 met the formulation requirements and the production rate was also increased through continuous manufacturing
Novel quality attributes | speed for early phase candidates | enhanced safety and productivity | reaction screening | reliable scale-up/out | particle engineering
Power Up Your Process Development Knowledge
Receive actionable process development insights and explore cutting edge process development news with great science delivered to your inbox every couple of months.